Charles Melbye - Latest Comments in Thin vs. Unicorn

Re: Thin vs. Unicorn

cmelbye — Fri, 29 Mar 2013 13:48:26 -0000

Heh, I didn't notice it expired. Would you be interested in transferring it to me or are you actually using it?

Re: Thin vs. Unicorn

Tedd Fox — Fri, 29 Mar 2013 13:45:45 -0000

I own PushyApp.com...hmmmm

Re: Thin vs. Unicorn

Softr8 — Fri, 27 Aug 2010 16:28:21 -0000

some updated info

http://blog.crowdint.com/20...

Re: Thin vs. Unicorn

Alexander — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 06:21:13 -0000

It is strange for me...
I have setup nginx + thin (4 worker) and nginx + unicorn (4 to)
and got equals result for it.
Please, could you explain how to configure unicorn and thin.

Re: Thin vs. Unicorn

cmelbye — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 01:14:39 -0000

Just do a reverse proxy to the port that Unicorn is running on.

http://kovyrin.net/2006/05/...

I can try to clean up my configuration and post it somewhere, but there's really nothing special. It's simply doing a reverse proxy to http://127.0.0.1:3000/

Re: Thin vs. Unicorn

Avdi Grimm — Wed, 07 Oct 2009 11:56:19 -0000

I'd be interested to see the memory usage stats.

Re: Thin vs. Unicorn

cmelbye — Wed, 07 Oct 2009 08:39:39 -0000

Yeah, I would/will just put it behind nginx with reverse proxying. I'm doing that right now at http://pushyapp.com/, but that's not a production environment as we're still developing it. GitHub, however, is using Unicorn in production and they're loving it.

Re: Thin vs. Unicorn

cmelbye — Wed, 07 Oct 2009 02:39:37 -0000

Tests were run on a Rackspace Cloud Server with 512 MB memory. Specifications of the host machine can be found here: http://www.rackspacecloud.c...